Good enough software
Andy Hunt and Dave Thomas talk about 'Good Enough Software'' in The Pragmatic Programmer: From Journeyman to Master. Specifically, they stress the importance of having a definition of 'Good Enough' for any given piece of work that is embarked upon. For instance, this definition will vary wildly when developing an automatic pilot system vs coding a throw away script to screen-scrape a fraternity website's member listing.
Thinking many months later around the subject, I thought it might be useful at work to have a sliding scale drawn up that defines pre-packaged "good enough" standards. These would contribute or guide the definition of done and might look something like:
- The product is fully tested, including unit, integration, system, random and load testing + 3 rounds of customer QA
- The front-end meets usability standards x, y and z
- The front-end meets accessibility standards x, y and z
- All code meets our code formatting guidelines
- A performance SLA is written up and the product surpasses it by x neurons
- Technical, client and sales documentation are present and meet our doc standards...
- ONE OFF SCRIPT
- It should work with the right input
- It should not fail gracefully (we don't have time)
- It should not check for bad input (we don't have time)
Clearly, there would be items between these two extremes.
Has anyone done this or something similar? I'm not sure there is a huge benefit to this, but having a definition of 'Good enough' per programming task or project is definitely a win. Thoughts?